The Harm of Cross Posting Content
/Clip from BSP-402: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHPcF6nWDKI
Originally aired: 22 SEP 2024
Clip from BSP-402: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHPcF6nWDKI
Originally aired: 22 SEP 2024
Clip from BSP-386: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRAMyU7dmew
Originally aired 21 APR 2024
Clip from BSP-402: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHPcF6nWDKI
Originally aired: 22 SEP 2024
I have seen “comment auto-reply suggestions” on YouTube studio for quite a while, but last week while pulling comments for the Bandrew Says Podcast, I looked a little bit closer at the suggestions and something caught my attention. In the past the auto replies consisted of generic canned responses such as “Thanks for watching”, “You’re welcome”, “I really appreciate that.”, but now the suggestion was inserting statements about my knowledge level and adding humbling statements.
Here’s the example I pulled:
Upon further review on 15 OCT 2024, YouTube put a blog post about “Testing AI-enhanced comment reply suggestions”, and they outline how the suggestions will start to include the content creators “tone and style”.
I find this to be completely and utterly baffling. I understand that all tech companies are trying to find a way to implement AI in new ways to try to find the trillion dollar idea, but this seems silly to me. The entire purpose of comments is to have interaction with people, and this is attempting to trick someone into thinking they’re having that kind of engagement with minimal input from the creator.
The wildest thing about all of it is that it actually made a statement about my knowledge “I’m just trying to figure out how this YouTube thing works” and then threw in that artificial humbleness “I’m not sure how much help I am, but thanks for watching!” which is incredibly disingenuous.
As soon as I saw this I had to share it because it’s just hilarious and interesting.
Clip from BSP-407: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2dPeR02I-g
Originally Aired: 3 NOV 2024
Clip from BSP-397: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=639HbyIO8Ok
Originally aired 11 AUG 2024
Recently Todd Cochrane (the CEO of Blubrry) posted a question on Podcastindex.social and he asked “Where are all the new podcast creators?” along with a photo showing an empty hall at Podcast Movement 2024. I want to clarify that James Cridland from Podnew.net pointed out this photo was taken prior to the event even opening, so the hall being empty is misleading. But I want to share my thoughts on why I, a lowly hobby podcaster, have not attended a single podcasting event as well as what I think may cause low attendance of “new podcast creators”.
The Schedule: Most podcast events are held in the middle of the work week. This means that in order to attend an event, us hobbyists or new podcasters, would need to take time off from our day jobs to attend.
The Podcast Economy: A few years ago there was a podcasting gold rush and millions of corporate dollars were being thrown around to acquire shows and launch new shows. Over the last few years there have been a few scandals about non-payment of guarantees due to lower than expected ad income. There has also been a skyrocketing of interest rates which makes borrowing money to launch shows much more expensive. I think that the lower than expected ad dollars and the more expensive money has led to fewer new shows launching which will also decrease the amount of new podcast creators.
The Cost: A big reason I won’t attend one of these events is the cost of it. Ignoring local transportation and food, we are already at $2,000 to attend this event. An estimate I came up with was $600 flight (round trip), $900 hotel ($300/night), $500 event ticket. Those three thing alone total $2,000 before tax, and it doesn’t account for transportation or food. That’s quite a big ask for a hobbyist or new podcaster just starting out.
When it comes to the value proposition of attending these podcast conferences, I don’t really think there is a good argument for hobbyists to attend. $2,000 + time off from work will be hard to justify unless there is INCREDIBLE information that is unavailable anywhere else. If networking is the main selling point, I understand a hobbyist maybe attending if it’s held within their city, but having to travel to the event removes any appeal for the hobbyist in my opinion (unless you are monetizing your show and earning a lot of money).
And the final question to ask is, could we be spending that money more effectively? To get the information, I could listen to any number of podcasts about podcasting, and watch YouTube videos for free. Then with the $2,000 I could get a podcast setup that will last me the entire podcasting career without ever needing to upgrade.
Clip from BSP-398: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQVCkRmVqG
Originally aired 25 AUG 2024
Clip from BSP-403: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-60QAwupyA
Originally aired: 29 SEP 2024
Clip from BSP-405: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SCpiCKV0TI
Originally aired: 13 OCT 2024
This is NOT the end of the world, but I wanted to go on a rant about this. Some idiot took my thumbnail and used it on their twitter post without any credit. Normally, I would not care much about this because any YouTuber or content creator understands this will happen. It’s inevitable. There are a few issues I have with the situation though:
When I called this person out, they took no corrective action to credit me. I do not expect someone to delete their post or anything. A simple reply to their own post stating “credit for artwork: link here” would have been enough. Days after the communication, nothing.
The type of content this person advocates for. They post about FACELESS SOCIAL MEDIA! I downright loathe this type of content as well as all the social media accounts that advocate for it.
And lastly, a question. If you are such a skilled faceless channel content creator who earns thousands of dollars from your brilliant strategies, why couldn’t you just make your own graphic? Why would you need to go out and take someone else’s work?
This may seem petty to you, and perhaps it is, but I have a strong disdain for faceless social media advocates and for fully AI-channel advocates for a plethora of reasons that were outlined in episode 388 of the BSP (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz4hpFUO2jU).
I believe the thing that makes YouTube and Podcasting so special is the fact that it started with people who only made content because they are passionate about a topic. It was not tainted by the idea of getting reach or famous, it was someone in a spare bedroom who felt the need to make a video about topic X or they would freak out. That passion comes through in a video; it’s not some sterile corporate nonsense, it’s authentic.
Enter these advocates for full-Ai content and faceless channels, they prey on people who are desperate to earn money with screenshots showing massive monthly earnings and views, promising that “you can do it too with these 10 steps”. I am highly skeptical that they are earning any significant income utilizing the advice they’re giving. My estimation is that they are earning money off of giving advice to people who desperately want to get rich and famous through social media.
Not only do I think they’re lying, and that their claims are bull crap, but I think they are advocating for content that ruins the quality of content available on platforms. The first place I noticed this was Everyday Carry. I used to search this topic regularly on YouTube, but now when I do it is flooded with crappy AI & Faceless Channel videos that are unwatchable. It led to me no longer searching for that type of content.
Bottom line, don’t be jerk and steal other people’s work.
Terrifier Poster Art Source: https://bloody-disgusting.com/movie/3787487/terrifier-3-heres-the-official-poster-for-next-years-holiday-slasher/
Slashers are one of the best sub genres of Horror, but there hasn’t been an Icon in a while. Art the Clown seems to be the first character to really penetrate the zeitgeist in the last few decades.
In the 70’s/80’s we got Michael, Jason, and Freddy. In the 90’s we got Ghost Face, and the Fisherman from IKWYDLS. Over the years there has also been plenty of fun one offs as well as a few series with interesting characters like: Jeepers Creepers or Hatchet. However, none of these characters reached that next level outside of the horror fans.
Enter Art! A mime/clown who I think does something different than most other slashers; he can make you laugh (Freddy Krueger being the obvious exception). Most killers in these movies lack any kind of humor, they are nothing more than evil unstoppable forces that are inescapable. Art has those same characteristics, he is evil, he is unstoppable, and he is inescapable, but he will also make you belly laugh. In my opinion that’s what makes him a special character.
As far as the movies go, Terrifier 1-3 are undeniable gorefests, so if you have a weak stomach, these will not be for you. Also, if you care about the story (yes there is a story), I highly recommend watching the first two movies in this series.
The cast and characters in these movies are fantastic from Lauren LaVera (Sienna Shaw), David Howard Thornton (Art), to Samantha Scaffidi (Victoria). The acting is well done, the story is intriguing, the music is top tier (just like the first to Terrifiers and All Hallow’s Eve), the direction is on point, AND the practical gore effects are absolutely insane.
If you are a horror fan or slasher fan, I think this is a must watch, and you owe it to yourself to catch this movie in a packed theater with an audience and a big tub of popcorn.
Podcastage
Bandrew Says Podcast
I Watch Movies
Watchcastage
BandrewPlays
Geeks Rising
Note: Links on website may be affiliate links. As an affiliate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Copyright © 2015 - 2024 Bandrew Scott - All Rights Reserved